It’s an assumed truth that Safari is better for battery life — without data to support it.

This article challenges the common belief that Safari is more battery-efficient than other browsers, particularly Chrome. It references a 2024 test by Matt Birchler, who ran a 20-minute loop of YouTube, Mastodon scrolling, website browsing, and Google Docs typing for 3 hours each across 6 trials, finding Chrome slightly better. The author argues that browser choice should be based on features, feel, or default status, not unproven battery claims. It also draws parallels to outdated web development myths like CSS selector performance and script placement, urging readers to update their thinking. Related posts on Safari and browser tools are linked.